Palm Verification vs Passwords
Stolen credentials are the #1 initial access vector in breaches. Passwords can be phished. OTPs intercepted. Magic links forwarded. Palm verification replaces all of them with something that can't be stolen, shared, or faked.
The credential problem is getting worse.
01
Can't be phished
Phishing works because passwords are knowledge. If you can trick someone into typing it, you have it. OTPs and magic links are just slightly harder to intercept, not impossible.
Palm biometrics can't be typed, forwarded, or intercepted. There is no credential to phish.
02
Can't be shared or transferred
Passwords get shared on sticky notes, Slack messages, and spreadsheets. Magic links get forwarded. OTPs get read aloud over the phone to social engineers.
Your palm can't be shared. It can't be dictated over the phone. It can't be written on a sticky note.
03
Nothing to remember
The average employee manages 191 passwords. Password managers help but add another dependency. Forgot the master password? Back to square one.
Your palm is always with you. No master password. No recovery email. No backup codes. Just you.
04
Survives SIM swap attacks
SMS-based OTPs are vulnerable to SIM swapping, where attackers convince carriers to transfer your number to their device. It's the #1 attack vector against 2FA.
Palm verification doesn't depend on phone numbers, SIM cards, or carrier cooperation. The biometric is the credential.
05
Zero support overhead
20-50% of help desk calls are password resets. That's a direct cost to your business in support hours, user frustration, and abandoned signups.
No passwords means no resets, no recovery flows, no "forgot password" support tickets. The cost center disappears.
